Nisha v. K.Ajith
Case brief
What is this about?
In this review petition, the Kerala High Court dismissed the review filed by the fourth respondent in an original writ petition. The court found no good ground for review as she had not participated in the writ proceedings and only raised factual contentions now.
What did the court decide?
Review petition dismissed; clarification given that petitioner must be heard before demolition of her compound wall if found in possession of puramboke land.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/11TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937
RP.No. 1129 of 2015 () IN WP(C).27259/2013
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 27259/2013 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 09-09-2015
REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/4TH RESPONDENT:
NISHA R., AGED 39 YEARS, D/O.RAMACHANDRAN, PUNNAVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, MUNDELA ARUVIKKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.THOMAS ABRAHAM SMT.MERCIAMMA MATHEW SRI.ASWIN.P.JOHN
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4:
1. K.AJITH S/O.KARUNAKARA PANICKER, AJITH VIHAR, KANIKKAPETTI MUNDELA P.O., ARUVIKKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a review petition raising factual contentions warrants acceptance when the petitioner had not appeared in the proceedings below.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nisha R.
- respondent
K. Ajith
- respondent
The Aruvikkara Grama Panchayath
- respondent
Deputy Director of Panchayath
- respondent
The Tahsildar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court