Sasidharan v. Mohan Nair
Case brief
What is this about?
Review petition filed against a judgment granting protection to the writ petitioner. The court held that no error apparent on the face of records was demonstrated. Consequently, the review petition failed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.JYOTHINDRANATH
MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/16TH BHADRA, 1937
RP.No. 110 of 2010 ( ) IN WP(C).28222/2009
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 28222/2009 DATED 16-10-2009
REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENTS 4 TO 8:
- PANAVILACODE SREE CHAMUNDI DEVI KSHETHRAM
- REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESENT PRESIDENT SASIDHARAN,
- RAKENDU, MULLOOR P.O.,VIZHINJAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
- RAMACHANDRAN, S/O.LEKSHMANAN NADAR, SECRETARY, PANAVILACODE SREE CHAMUNDI DEVI KSHETHRAM
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the review petition discloses any error apparent on the face of the records warranting exercise of review power.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Panavilacode Sree Chamundi Devi Kshethram
- respondent
Mohan Nair
- respondent
Director General of Police, Kerala
- respondent
City Police Commissioner, Thiruvananthapuram
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court