Manu Alias Saidalavi v. Dominique
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal rejected due to non-payment of balance court fee despite repeated adjournments for fee payment. No substantive decision on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC & THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/10TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937
RFA.No. 362 of 2010 ( ) ------------------------
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS 180/2004 of SUB COURT, OTTAPPALAM DATED 30-09-2009
APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF.:
MANU ALIAS SAIDALAVI, S/O. KARINGANTHODI MUHAMMED, RESIDING AT IRUMBALASSERY DESOM, EZHUVANTHALA AMSOM OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON SRI.JIBU P THOMAS SRI.P.S.APPU SRI.A.R.NIMOD SRI.C.A.ANOOP
RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT.:
DOMINIQUE, S/O. MUKKILIKODE PHILIPPOSE, RESIDING AT CHERPLASSERY AMSOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
R,R1 BY ADV. SRI.D.KRISHNA PRASAD R,R1 BY ADV. SMT.O.K.SANTHA
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC & P.V ASHA, JJ.
R.F.A No.362 of 2010-J
Dated this the 1st day of December, 2015
JUDGMENT
Antony Dominic, J.
In this appeal, which was admitted on 5.12.2013, time was granted thrice for payment of balance court fee. But even today, the balance court fee remains unpaid. In view of this, the appeal
is rejected.
Sd/-
ANTONY DOMINIC
Judge
Sd/-
P.V.ASHA
Judge
rtr/
/true copy/
P.S to Judge
MANU ALIAS SAIDALAVI
DOMINIQUE
ANTONY DOMINIC
P.V ASHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court