COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
Appeal dismissed for non-payment of balance court fee.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
TUESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/13TH SRAVANA, 1937
RFA.No. 239 of 2009 ( )
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 119/2006 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,ALAPPUZHA DATED 30-03-2007
APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS:
1. M/S. ASWATHI DETERGENTS & CHEMICALS,
2. SHIRELY, MANAGING PARTNER, M/S. ASWATHI DETERGENTS &
BY ADV. SRI.A.KRISHNAN
RESPONDENT(S)/PLAINTIFF:
M/S. HINDUSTAN LEVER LTD., REGISTERED OFFICE AT 165/166, BACKBAY RECLAMATION, MUMBAI-400 020, REGIONAL OFFICE AT 101, SANTHOME HIGH ROAD, CHENNAI, REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS LAW OFFICER.
R BY ADVs. SRI.P.RADHAKRISHNAN (1) SRI.MADHU RADHAKRISHNAN
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
DG
THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN &
SUNIL THOMAS, JJ.
----------------------------------------------------------------R.F.A.No. 239 of 2009
------------------------------------------------------------------Dated this the 4th day of August, 2015
J U D G M E N T
Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J.
Learned counsel for the appellants says that his clients have not reached in spite of issuance of notice. The appeal is rejected for non-payment of balance court fee. Refund court fee paid at the time of institution of the appeal to the appellants, through their counsel appearing before this Court.
Sd/-
(THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE)
Sd/- (SUNIL THOMAS, JUDGE)
//TRUE COPY//
P.A TO JUDGE
DG
M/S. Aswathi Detergents & Chemicals
Shirely
M/S. Hindustan Lever Ltd.
Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan
Sunil Thomas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
