Alikutty v. Akber
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought release of a fixed deposit and discharge of his next friend in a motor accident compensation matter held pending. The High Court, noting genuine emergency, disposed of the petition without notice and directed the Tribunal to consider the applications within two weeks.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of directing MACAT Tirur to consider applications for release of fixed deposit and discharge of next friend within two weeks.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI
THURSDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JULY 2015/18TH ASHADHA, 1937
OP (MAC).No. 91 of 2015 (O)
IA NO. 2529/15 IN OP(MV) NO. 863/05 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, TIRUR.
PETITIONER/PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
ALIKUTTY, S/O ABDUL KADAR(LATE), AGED 35 YEARS, CHANDANATHEDIL HOUSE, P.O. CHIRAVALLOOR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT(S):
1. AKBER, S/O KUNHIBAVA, ALIAMKKANAKATH HOUSE, P.O.PONNANI SOUTH, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN- 679 586(DRIVER)
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to issue notice to respondents before disposing of the writ petition.
Whether to direct the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Tirur to consider applications for release of fixed deposit and discharge of next friend without undue delay.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Alikutty, S/o Abdul Kadar(Late)
- respondent
Akber, S/o Kunhibava
- respondent
Gafoor K.T
- respondent
The United India Insurance Company Limited
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court