Baiju M.R. v. Sankunny
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought direction to the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Irinjalakkuda for early disposal of two interim applications regarding consideration of an ex parte award and condonation of delay. Court issued time bound order.
What did the court decide?
Directed the MACT, Irinjalakkuda to consider and pass orders on I.A Nos.430 and 437 of 2015 within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI
THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/21ST JYAISHTA, 1937
OP (MAC).No. 78 of 2015 (O)
OPMV 1081/2008 of MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, IRINJALAKUDA
PETITIONER :
------------------
BAIJU M.R., AGED 35 YEARS, S/O RAVI, MOOLAKKATTIL HOUSE, NELLAYI VILLAGE, NELLAYI P.O., MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICTR
BY ADVS.SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.N.L.BITTO
RESPONDENTS :
----------------------
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the MACT should be directed to dispose of pending interlocutory applications within a time bound period.
What.time limit. should the MACT observe for considering the petition to set aside the ex parte award and the petition for condoning delay.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
BAIJU M.R.
- respondent
SANKUNNY
- respondent
LITHEESH
- respondent
BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE, CO.LTD
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court