Stephan v. Johny
Case brief
What is this about?
In O.C. No. 3752 of 2012, the Kerala High Court allowed the petition challenging the dismissal of a suit. The court held that splitting the prayer to reject withdrawal with liberty and dismiss the suit was illegal per Jacob Vs. State Bank of Travancore and set aside the order.
What did the court decide?
The order rejecting withdrawal with liberty and the dismissal decree were set aside; the petitioner was directed to proceed with the trial.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
MONDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/2ND AGRAHAYANA, 1937
OP(C).No. 3752 of 2012 (O)
O.S.NO.459/2005 OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, ALUVA
PETITIONER(S) :
1. STEPHEN, AGED 60 YEARS, S/O.POULO, GOPURATHINKAL, KARAYAMPARAMBU KARA, KARUKUTTY VILLAGE, ALUVA TALUK.
2. PREM STEPHEN, AGED 31 YEARS, S/O.STEPHEN, GOPURATHINKAL, KARAYAMPARAMBU KARA, KARUKUTTY VILLAGE, ALUVA TALUK.
3. THOMAS STEPHEN, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O.STEPHEN, GOPURATHINKAL, KARAYAMPARAMBU KARA, KARUKUTTY VILLAGE, ALUVA TALUK.
BY ADVS.SMT.JEENA JOSEPH
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court erred in splitting the prayer by rejecting withdrawal of suit with liberty to file fresh suit and dismissing the suit separately.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Stephen
- petitioner
Prem Stephen
- petitioner
Thomas Stephen
- respondent
Johnny
- respondent
Philomina
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court