"The improvements effected by the plaintiff have a value of Rs. 2 lakhs as per the accounts shown below. In his helplessness the plaintiff had even applied to Government to give him the land in which he had effected improvements, on kuthakapattom. But out of the said land 160 acres were taken out of my possession and given to the 2nd defendant even without giving me the opportunity to remove the movable improvements, such as cultivation, cattle, machines, utensils, houses, stocked crops, ripe crops etc., belonging to me." These averments in the above paragraph do not clearly allege that he was evicted without notice, nor has any allegation been made that he was forcibly evicted from the lands with the help of the police etc. as it has now been contended before us. On the other hand what the plaintiff (appellant stated snows that no opportunity was given to him to remove the movable improvements such as cultivation' cattle, machines, utensils, houses, stocked crops, ripe crops etc. which belonged to 1-him. There is nothing stated by him that he had no opportunity to cut trees and take them away. Even in paragraph-4 of the plaint where he complains that no notice of forfeiture was given to him, he mentions only the items referred to in paragraph-3. It is in this connection he says, that no legal procedure had been followed by Government for taking them into possession which only implies that it is in respect of the items mentioned in paragraph-3. It is again stated in paragraph-4 that "It was irregular on the part of Government to take possession of the above items',. The respondent did not understand the averments in the plaint as
