The Kerala High Court dismissed the Land Acquisition Appeal by the State of Kerala. The Court held that the matter was already sub judice in an earlier appeal regarding the Ext.A1 judgment, rendering the current appeal devoid of merit.
The appeal is dismissed as devoid of any merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/18TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937
LA.App..No. 1810 of 2002 (B)
(AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN LAR 30/1993 of SUB COURT, MAVELIKKARA DATED 14-12-2000)
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT::
STATE OF KERALA.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. L. ALOSIOUS THOMAS.
RESPONDENTS/CLAIMANTS::
THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON &
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, JJ.
L.A.A.No.1810 OF 2002
Dated this the 9th December, 2015
JUDGMENT
P.R. Ramachandra Menon, J.
This appeal arises from the judgment and decree passed by the Sub Court, Mavelikkara in L.A.R.No.30 of 1993. The grievance is against the enhancement, which according to the appellant/State is quite exorbitant. When the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned Government Pleader submits that the judgment and decree under challenge were passed based on Ext.A2 judgment. It is stated that no appeal has been preferred by the State against Ext.A2. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that in respect of Ext.A1 judgment, which was sought to be relied on for the purpose of proportionate enhancement, an appeal had been preferred by the State as L.A.A.No.434 of 1997 , wherein interference was declined and appeal was dismissed.
L.A.A.No.1810 OF 2002
2
nothing further survives to be considered in this matter. The appeal is dismissed as devoid of any merit.
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, JUDGE
lk
L.A.A.No.1810 OF 2002
3
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON & ANIL K. NARENDRAN, JJ.
...................................................
L.A.A. No.1810 of 2002
................................................... Dated this the 9th December, 2015
J U D G M E N T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the enhanced compensation awarded in the lower court should be allowed or corrected.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State of Kerala
Kochuv acquey Oommen
Moly Ummen
K. George
P.O. Mathew
O. Chacko
P.R. Ramachandra Menon
Anil K. Narendran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
