R. Madhavan Pillai v. Vidhukumar
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH 2015/12TH PHALGUNA, 1936 FAO (RO).No. 333 of 2013 ()
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN AS 6/2010 of ADDL.D.C.-II, MAVELIKKARA, DATED 22-10-2013
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS 356/2000 of MUNSIFF COURT, KAYAMKULAM DATED 09-12-2009
APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 1,3, 5 TO 8/DEFENDANTS 1 AND 3 AND L.RS. OF 2ND DEFENDANT:-
1. R. MADHAVAN PILLAI AGED 75 YEARS S/O.RAMAN PILLAI, CHARUVARATHU VEEDU PATHIYOORKALA MURI, PATHIOYOOR VILLAGE, PIN-690 508.
2. NASRENDRAN PILLAI AGED 81 YEARS S/O.RAMAN PILLAI, CHARUVARTHU SANTHINIKETHAN PATHIYOORKALA MURI, PATHIYOORKALA MURI PATHIOYOOR VILLAGE, PIN-690 508.
3. REMAYAMMA @ RAMA DEVI W/O.RAMAN PILLAI, CHARUVARATHU VEEDU PATHIYOORKALA MURI, PATHIOYOOR VILLAGE, PIN-690 508.
4. R.MEERA DEVI AGED 52 YEARS D/O.CHANDRASHEKARAN PILLAI VAISAKH (MAYOORAM) EAST KODUNGALOOR, U.C.COLLEGE, P.O ., ALUVA, PIN-683 102.
5. R.MAYA DEVI AGED 45 YEARS S/O.CHANDRASHEKARAN PILLAI, CHARUVARATHU VEEDU PATHIYOORKALA MURI, PATHIOYOOR VILLAGE, PIN-690 508.
6. R.MEERA DEVI AGED 45 YEARS D/O..CHANDRASHEKARAN PILLAI, CHARUVARATHU VEEDU PATHIYOORKALA MURI, PATHIOYOOR VILLAGE, PIN-690 508. 7. MANJU AGED 41 YEARS D/O..CHANDRASHEKARAN PILLAI, CHARUVARATHU VEEDU PATHIYOORKALA MURI, PATHIOYOOR VILLAGE, PIN-690 508.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.MARTIN JOSE SRI.THOMAS P.KURUVILLA SRI.P.PRIJITH
(.............2)
FAO (RO).No. 333 of 2013
-: 2 :-
RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:-
VIDHUKUMAR S/O.GOVINDAKURUP, CHARUVARATHU, SIVAMANDIRAM PATHIYOORKALALMURI, PATHIOYOOR VILLAGE, KEERIKODU P.O. 690 508. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE(PERUMPALLIKUTTIYIL) BY ADV. SRI.A.R.DILEEP BY ADV. SRI.MANU SEBASTIAN BY ADV. SRI.K.J.SHARATH KUMAR
THIS FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER - REMAND ORDER HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Kvs/-
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = =
F.A.O.(RO).No.333 of 2013.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Dated this the 3rd day of March, 2015.
J U D G M E N T
The parties to this appeal have settled the disputes by recourse to mediation. The settlement arrived at between the parties at the mediation is part of the records. In the light of the settlement, the suit O.S.No.356 of 2000 on the file of the Munsiff Court, Kayamkulam is disposed of in terms of the settlement. A copy of the settlement shall be appended to this judgment and the original shall be preserved.
Sd/- P.B.SURESH KUMAR, (JUDGE)
Kvs/-
// true copy //
PA TO JUDGE.
R. Madhavan Pillai
Nasrendran Pillai
Remayamma @ Rama Devi
R. Meera Devi
R. Maya Devi
Manju
P.B. Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court