The First Appeal was found to have become infructuous due to a settlement reached between the parties, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.
The appeal was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JULY 2015/10TH ASHADHA, 1937
FAO.No. 332 of 2011 ( )
AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.A.1161/2011 IN OS 715/2009 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,KOLLAM DATED 31.08.2011
APPELLANT/2nd DEFENDANT:
SOORYAKUMARI AMMA, AGED 57 YEARS, W/O.KRISHNA MENON, KAVUMGARA VEEDU THAZHAM, CHATHANNOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT NOW RESIDING AT TRA-118, GOKULAM, MUNDAKKAL WEST KOLLAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.G.ANIL BABU SRI.R.RAJESH(PULLIKADA)
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
K.GOPALAKRISHNAN, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O.LATE KUTTAPPAN, GOKULAM ULIYAKOVIL, KOLLAM-691001
R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.T. SURESHKUMAR
THIS FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDERS HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN & SUNIL THOMAS, JJ.
==============================
F.A.O.No.332 of 2011
==============================
Dated this the 1st day of July, 2015
JUDGMENT
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that this matter has been settled between the parties. Therefore, this appeal is not required to be prosecuted.
This appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN Judge
Sd/-
SUNIL THOMAS Judge
Sbna
Sooryakumari Amma
K. Gopakrishnan
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan
Sunil Thomas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
