K.C.Jose v. C.K.Geetha
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed the first appeal filed by the appellant against an order dismissing an application for temporary injunction, holding that no ground for interference existed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
THURSDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF JULY 2015/11TH ASHADHA, 1937
FAO.No. 26 of 2012 ()
(AGAINST ORDER DATED 15.12.2011 IN I.A.NO.1304/2011 IN O.S.NO.268/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF THE SUB JUDGE, SULTHAN BATHERY)
APPELLANT(S)/PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF:
K.C.JOSE S/O.CHACKO, AGED 47 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST KIZHAKKE MANNOOR VEEDU, ARATTUTHARA DESOM MANANTHAVADY AMSOM, MANANTHAVADY TALUK, WAYANAD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.KRISHNAN UNNI (SR.) SRI.K.C.KIRAN SRI.JAMSHEED HAFIZ SMT.P.A.SHEEJA SMT.MEENA.A.
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDENTS:
1. C.K.GEETHA D/O. P.C.BALAKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SREE MANDIRAM ARATTUTHARA DESOM, MANANTHAVADY AMSOM MANANTHAVADY TALUK, WAYANAD DISTRIT, PIN-670 645.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal against the dismissal of an application for temporary injunction is maintainable and requires interference.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.C.Jose
- respondent
C.K.Geetha
- respondent
C.K.Rajeevan
- respondent
C.K.Devadas
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court