said person can also be done only in the temple establishment. We think that it is not necessary for us to further go into this issue because in the ultimate analysis, the whole thrust of the jurisprudence governing dying in harness recruitment or compassionate appointment is to evolve a methodology to provide an immediate sucker to the dependent in need. Sri.Chellappa Kurup died in 1985. In 2007, his son Manoj M.C. was appointed as Adichuthali which means cleaning of vessels and other attendant activities of cleaning. In 2014, we are unable to see that he does have the sustenance to enable him to agitate for an appointment on dying in harness ground. The mere fact that he claims that he ought to have been appointed in the establishment section and not in the temple wing cannot be considered in the context of a request for providing some aid to a person in need. He is already drawing emoluments as Adichuthali and his case cannot now be considered for any other post under the dying in harness scheme. The views of the learned Ombudsman is fully justified and we concur with it. We also see no ground to take a different view, having regard to what
