The revision petitioner sought leave to withdraw with liberty to file a writ petition under Article 226. The court dismissed the petition but granted the requested liberty.
Petitioner granted liberty to file O.P under Article 226 of the Constitution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/24TH ASWINA, 1937
CRP.No. 474 of 2015
EA.NO.1(A)/2012 AND EA.NO.20/2012 IN EP.NO.167/2011 IN OS 382/2004 OF MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM.
REVISION PETITIONER/2ND JUDGMENT DEBTOR:
CORPORATION OF COCHIN, PARK AVENUE ROAD, COCHIN-11, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
BY ADVS.SRI.S.SUDHISH KUMAR
SRI.K.B.DAYAL
RESPONDENT(S):
1. FRANCIS THOTTAN, S/O.LONAPPAN, THOTTAN HOUSE, SOUTH KALOOR, KOCHI-682 017.
2. THE SECRETARY,
G.C.D.A, KADAVANTHARA, KOHCI-20.
R1 BY ADVS. SMT.P.V.KOCHUTHRESIA SMT.M.P.MARY
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
mbr/
CRP.No. 474 of 2015
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE A1 : TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION TO THE STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTS APPENDED WITH THE COMMISSION REPORT. ANNEXURE A2 : A TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN SHOWING THE REMITTANCE OF RS.1,73,070/-BY THE REVISION PETITIONER. ANNEXURE A3 : TRUE COPY OF THE COMMISSION REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER. ANNEXURE A4 : TRUE COPIES OF THE STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT SUBMITTED BY THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER. ANNEXURE A5 : TRUE COPY OF EXHIBIT B1 ESTIMATE PREPARED BY THE ASST. ENGINEER, LSGD.
RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.S. TO JUDGE
mbr/
K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
C.R.P.No.474 of 2015
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dated this the 16th day of October, 2015
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he
may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file O.P under Article 227 of the Constitution.
In the result, this C.R.P is dismissed. The petitioner is granted liberty to file O.P under Article 227 of
Constitution.
sd/-
K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE
R.AV
//True Copy//
PA to Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision petitioner may withdraw the petition with liberty to file a writ petition under Article 226.
Corporation of Cochin
Francis Thottan
Secretary, G.C.D.A
K. Abraham Matthew
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
