Ruksana v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge set aside Condition No.4 of an interim custody order requiring the petitioner to furnish security by depositing title deeds during the trial of a criminal case involving seized gold.
What did the court decide?
Condition No.4 directing the petitioner to furnish security by depositing title deed was set aside.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID
TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH 2015/12TH PHALGUNA, 1936
Crl.MC.No.996 of 2015 ()
AGAINST THE ORDER IN CMP 4433/2014 of JUDL.M.F.C.-I,ERNAKULAM DATED 25-12-2014 CRIME NO. 999/2014 OF PALARIVATTOM POLICE STATION , ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
RUKSANA, AGED 36 YEARS W/O.RATHEESH KUMAR, GALAXY HOME, KLINSTOM 4TH FLOOR, 4F, CHILAVANOOR ROAD KADAVANTHRA.
BY ADV. SRI.P.A.MARTIN ROY
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether condition No.4 requiring security by depositing title deed should be set aside.
Whether other conditions imposed by the Magistrate suffice to ensure production of seized properties.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RUKSANA
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
P.UBAID
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court