Suseela v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged Sessions Court order denying her interim custody of vehicle under Section 451 Cr.P.C. Court held petitioner is actual custodian and allowed petition to release vehicle on conditions.
What did the court decide?
Impugned order set aside and petitioner directed to get vehicle released on appropriate reasonable conditions.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID
MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH 2015/11TH PHALGUNA, 1936
Crl.MC.No.938 of 2015 ()
-------------------------AGAINST THE ORDER IN CMP 98/2015 of SESSIONS COURT,PATHANAMTHITTA DATED 24-01-2015 CRIME NO. 6/2015 OF PATHANAMTHITTA POLICE STATION , PATHANAMTITTA
PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED :
SUSEELA, AGED 50 YEARS W/O.SREEDHARAN, MEMURIYIL HOUSE, EDANADU MURI, MALAYALAPPUZHA VILLAGE.
BY ADV. SRI.M.T.SURESH KUMAR
RESPONDENTS/COUNTER PETITIONER/STATE :
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM -682 031.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, mother of the registered owner and actual custodian absent abroad, is entitled to interim custody of the vehicle.
Whether the Sessions Court order dismissing the application for interim custody under Section 451 CrPC be set aside.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SUSEELA
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
P.UBAID
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court