serve any purpose provided the prosecution does not involve any public issue or any public interest. Here even otherwise, I find that the prosecution does not have any satisfactory materials for a successful culmination. The complaint or the final report does not show the nature of the job alleged. The victim was admittedly between 14 years and 18 years at the time of incident. A prosecution under Section 26 of the J.J.Act is possible only on the allegation that the juvenile victim was employed for some hazardous job, without making prompt and proper payment of adequate wages. Such definite allegations are not there in the complaint or in the final report. The casual allegation is that the child was employed for some domestic works. It is nowhere alleged that it was hazardous in nature, or that she was being financially exploited. The complaint or final report also does not show how exactly the juvenile was harassed by the petitioner. Thus, I find that the prosecution records do not contain the necessary elements for a successful prosecution. Any way, the parties have come to terms amicably. They have no grievance or complaint now. I find that continuance of the prosecution in such