Allowed

Gokul Krishna v. Alvin Paul

Kerala HC20 Nov 2015Crl.MC/6418/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala allowed a criminal miscellaneous petition filed by 22 accused persons. The court quashed the First Information Report under Sections 143, 144, 147, 323, 324 and 149 of IPC after finding that the matter had been amicably settled between the respondents and the petitioners.

What did the court decide?

The First Information Report in Crime No.1539/2015 of Angamaly Police Station and all further proceedings thereon are quashed.

Gokul Krishna Vs Alvin Paul — Quashing and FIR | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/29TH KARTHIKA, 1937

¶5

Crl.MC.No. 6418 of 2015

¶6

CRIME NO. 1539/2015 OF ANGAMALY POLICE STATION , ERNAKULAM

¶7

PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 22 :

¶8

1. GOKUL KRISHNA P.K., AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.UNNIKRISHNAN, SREE PADMAM (H), A.R.ROAD,

¶9

ARUKIZHAYA, MANJERI, MALAPPURAM.

¶10

2. UNNI KRISHNAN P., AGED 21 YEARS

¶11

S/O.P.KRISHNA KUMAR, PARIYADATH (H), NADAVARAMBA P.O.,

¶12

IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR.

¶13

3. NIRMAL V.K., AGED 21 YEARS,

¶14

S/O.K.K.PADMAKSHAN, PATTER VAYAL (H), CHOKLI P.O.,

¶15

THALASSERY VIA, KANNUR.

¶16

4. AKHIL VINCENT, AGED 21 YEARS,

¶17

S/O.C.L.VINCENT, CHERIYAKATTEYATH (H), KOONAMAVU P.O., ERNAKULAM.

¶18

5. ATHISH RAJ S., AGED 21 YEARS,

¶19

S/O.SUNIL RAJ S., IRATTU (H), AYANKAVU TEMPLE ROAD,

¶20

IRINJALAKKUDA P.O., THRISSUR.

¶21

6. RAJ KUMAR T.M., AGED 22 YEARS,

¶22

S/O.T.MADHAVANKUTTY, KCP HOUSE, IRANIKULAM P.O.,

¶23

MALA, THRISSUR.

¶24

7. ANANTHAKRISHNAN A., AGED 21 YEARS,

¶25

S/O.ASHOK KUMAR N.V., MADATHIPARAMBIL (H),

¶26

VAZHAPALLY P.O., CHANGANASSERY, KOTTAYAM.

¶27

8. GOKUL BIJU A., AGED 22 YEARS,

¶28

S/O.BIJU BALAN, AIKKARAPARAMBIL (H),

¶29

THIRUVANKULAM P.O., ERNAKULAM.

¶30

9. SREEHARI SREENI, AGED 21 YEARS,

¶31

S/O.SREENIVASAN, PANATTU (H), SREENILAYAM,

¶32

PERINJANAM P.O., THRISSUR.

¶33

..2/-

¶34

..2..

¶35

Crl.MC.No. 6418 of 2015

¶36

10. AASHIQ K.L., AGED 21 YEARS, S/O.LATHEEF U.M., KANAPPILLY PARAMBIL (H), ELOOR NORTH, UDYOGAMANDAL P.O., ELOOR.

¶37

11. ADARH ANANTHAN, AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.ANANTHAKUMARA PANICKER K.P., PATHIYIL ANJALI BHAVAN, BUDHANOOR P.O., CHENGANOOR, ALAPPUZHA.

¶38

12. NEETHISH K.K., AGED 21 YEARS, S/O.P.G.KRISHNAN NAIR, KURUNGATTU (H), KEEZHILLAM P.O., KEEZHILLAM.

¶39

13. BASIL JOY, AGED 21 YEARS,

¶40

S/O.JOY K.M., KARIPRA HOUSE, KUTTA,

¶41

KANINADU P.O., PUTHENCRUZ, ERNAKULAM.

¶42

14. ASFAR P.A., AGED 21 YEARS,

¶43

S/O.ABDUL KAREEM, PATHUVANA CHERUKATIL (H),

¶44

KAYANTIKKARA, MUPPATHADOM P.O., ALUVA.

¶45

15. GAUTHAM PADMANABHAN, AGED 20 YEARS,

¶46

S/O.PADMANABHAN, NAKSHATRA (H), BOSE NAGAR,

¶47

S T P ROAD, ELAMKULAM, KADAVANTHRA.

¶48

16. JITHU PETER, AGED 21 YEARS,

¶49

S/O.T.P.PETER, THAILATH HOUSE, VARAPUZHA LANDING P.O., ERNAKULAM.

¶50

17. RESWIN A.KHADIR, AGED 21 YEARS,

¶51

S/O.KHADAR PILLAI, ALAMANA (H), PARAMBAYAM,

¶52

NEDUMBASSERY P.O., ALUVA.

¶53

18. KRISHNA CHANDRAN K.S., AGED 21 YEARS,

¶54

S/O.K.SUDHEESH BABU, SARASWATHY (H),

¶55

THRIKKALATHOOR P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA.

¶56

19. GOVIND MENON, AGED 21 YEARS,

¶57

S/O.GANESH P.MENON, LATHIKA NIVAS, JAWAHAR NAGAR ROAD, THIRUVANKULAM P.O., ERNAKULAM.

¶58

20. GEORGE SUNNY THURUTHUMALIL, AGED 21 YEARS,

¶59

S/O.SUNNY GEORGE THURUTHUMALIL, 2A,

¶60

PHASE 1, SILVER LAWNS, MAROTTICHODU,

¶61

EDAPILLY, ERNAKULAM.

¶62

21. SIBIN BABU M., AGED 22 YEARS,

¶63

S/O.ANANDA BABU M.K., SHRUTHI (H), MOONUPENYA,

¶64

MUNDALUR P.O., KANNUR.

¶65

BY ADV. SRI.BIBIN KUMAR

¶66

..3/-

¶67

..3..

¶68

Crl.MC.No. 6418 of 2015

¶69

RESPONDENT(S) :

¶70

1. ALWIN PAUL, AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.THOMAS, CHEKKANDATHIL, PALLIKUNNU, KANNUR - 670 004.

¶71

2. P.B.JAYAKRISHNAN, AGED 21 YEARS, S/O.BABY KUMARAN, PANJAJANYAM, KOMALAPURAM, AVALUKUNNU P.O., ALAPUZHA, PIN - 688 006.

¶72

3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA.

¶73

R1 TO R2 BY ADV. SRI.IEANS.C.CHAMAKKALA R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.SAREENA GEORGE

¶74

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶75

Msd.

¶76

Crl.MC.No. 6418 of 2018

¶77

APPENDIX

¶78

PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES :

¶79

ANNEXURE A1: CERTIFIED COPY OF THE F.I.R. ANNEXURE A2: CERTIFIED COPY OF THE F.I STATEMENT. ANNEXURE A3: AFFIDAVIT OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE A4: AFFIDAVIT OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

¶80

RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES :

NIL

//TRUE COPY//

P.S.TO JUDGE.

Msd.

B. KEMAL PASHA, J.

¶86

................................................................ CRL.M.C. No. 6418 of 2015

¶87

............................................................... Dated this the 20^th day of November, 2015

¶88

O R D E R

¶89

Petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 22 in Crime No.1539/2015 of the Angamaly Police Station, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 144, 147, 323 and 324 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶90

It seems that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. The first respondent, who is the defacto complainant and the other injured have filed separate affidavits affirming that the matter has been amicably settled between them and the petitioners and they have no complaints against the petitioners. When the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, no

¶91

CRL.M.C.No. 6418 of 2015

¶92

-: 2 :-

¶93

purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter any further. Matters being so, Annexure-A1 First Information Report in Crime No.1539/2015 of the Angamaly Police Station, and all further proceedings on it, can be quashed.

¶94

In the result, this Crl.M.C. is allowed and Annexure-A1

¶95

First Information Report in Crime No.1539/2015 of the Angamaly Police Station, and all further proceedings on it, are hereby quashed.

¶96

Sd/- B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE

¶97

ul/-

¶98

[True copy] P.S. to Judge

Gokul Krishna v. Alvin Paul

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gokul Krishna v. Alvin Paul

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Salam C.H Vs State of Kerala

Salam C.H. Vs State of Kerala

Riyas Vs State of Kerala

Sudheesh Vs State of Kerala

Alwin Paul Vs Clinto

Hamson Vs State of Kerala