Allowed

V.K.Ummerkutty v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC14 Sept 2015Crl.MC/6089/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Kerala allowed a petition to quash criminal prosecution in S.C No.229/2012. The court found a genuine settlement between the accused and the complainant regarding charges of threatening to cause hurt and criminal intimidation, ruling that continuance of prosecution serves no purpose.

What did the court decide?

The prosecution in S.C No.229/2012 was quashed under Section 482 CrPC; the petitioner was released from prosecution and the bail bond was discharged.

V.K.Ummerkutty Vs State of Kerala — Quashing and FIR | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID

¶4

MONDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/23RD BHADRA, 1937

¶5

Crl.MC.No. 6089 of 2015

¶6

IN SC 229/2012 of SUB COURT, MANJERI

¶7

CRIME NO. 388/2011 OF KOLATHUR POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM

¶8

PETITIONER:

¶9

V.K.UMMERKUTTY, AGED 74 YEARS, S/O.KUNHUNNIYAN HAJI, RESIDING AT VATTAKANDATHIL HOUSE, P.O.CHELAKKAD KATTUPPARA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

¶10

BY ADV. SRI.SURAJ.S

¶11

RESPONDENTS:

¶12

1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-682 031.

¶13

2. MOHAMMED RAFI, AGED 40 YEARS S/O.KOYA HAJI, MELEPURATH HOUSE, PULAMANTHOLE AMSOM, DESOM, PERINTHALMANNA TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679 322.

¶14

R2 BY ADV. SRI.NIRMAL V NAIR R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.SHEEBA M.T

¶15

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

Crl.MC.No. 6089 of 2015

¶17

APPENDIX

¶18

PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:

¶19

ANNEXURE A- COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.388/2011 OF THE KOLATHUR POLICE STATION.

¶20

ANNEXURE B- CHARGE CHEET IN CRIME NO.388/2011 IN S.C.229/2012 ON THE FILE OF SUB COURT, MANJERI.

¶21

ANNEXURE C- A COPY OF AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

¶22

RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES:

NIL

//TRUE COPY//

P.A TO JUDGE

P.UBAID, J.

--------------------------------------Crl.M.C No.6089 of 2015

¶29

---------------------------------------

¶30

Dated this the 14^th day of September, 2015

¶31

O R D E R

¶32

The petitioner herein is the accused in S.C No.229/2012 of the Sub Court, Manjeri. He seeks orders quashing the prosecution on the ground of amicable settlement of the whole dispute between him and the de facto complainant. Crime in this case was registered under Sections 341 and 308 of the Indian Penal Code on the complaint of one Mohammed Rafi who is the 2^nd respondent in this proceeding brought under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. He has filed affidavit to the effect that he has settled the whole dispute with the accused, and he has no grievance or complaint now.

¶33

In so many decisions, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that even in cases involving non-compoundable offences, the High Court can quash the prosecution in pending proceedings, if the parties have really settled the whole dispute amicably out of court, and continuance of the prosecution will not serve any purpose in such a circumstance of amicable

¶34

¶35

Crl.M.C No.6089 of 2015

¶36

settlement. Here, I find a real and genuine case of settlement between the parties. This is not a case involving any public interest or public issue. On a perusal of the materials, including the final report, I find that Section 308 IPC was incorporated by the police on the basis of some hypothetical statement. This appears to be a simple case of assault. Anyway, the counter case also stands settled. The parties have come to terms amicably on the intervention of persons acceptable to both sides. In such a situation, continuance of the prosecution will not serve any purpose other than wasting the precious time of the court. No doubt, nobody will support the prosecution in such a situation, if the case goes to trial.

¶37

In the result, this petition is allowed. The prosecution against the petitioner herein in S.C No.229/2012 of the Sub Court, Manjeri will stand quashed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Accordingly, the petitioner will stand released from prosecution, and the bail bond, if any, executed by him will stand discharged.

¶38

P.UBAID JUDGE

¶39

V.K.Ummerkutty v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.K.Ummerkutty v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.C. Pramod Das Vs State of Kerala

Manaf Vs Safiya

Nissam K.S Vs Jasmin

Muhammed Rafi Vs State of Kerala

Gopalakrishnan Vs G. Aswathy

T.N.Ashokan Vs State of Kerala