Manzoor T.R v. Fasiya
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court held that an interim maintenance order under Section 125 CrPC is not amenable to revision and cannot be quashed under Section 482 CrPC. The petitioner was directed to approach the trial court for modification.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to approach the trial court for modification or cancellation of the interim maintenance order.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID
WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/25TH BHADRA, 1937
Crl.MC.No. 4615 of 2015
IN M.P NO.294/2015 IN MC 112/2015 of FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:
MANZOOR T.R, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O. RAHIM, THOTTATHIPARAMBIL HOUSE, THURUTH, ALUVA P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-683101.
BY ADV. SMT.P.K.PRIYA
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS:
1. FASIYA, AGED 23 YEARS, D/O K.A.SABU, KADAVIL HOUSE, H.NO.39 B, BHAVANS SOUTH ROAD, RESIDENCE ASSOCIATION, ELAMAKKARA COCHIN-682026.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a revision petition can lie against an interim maintenance order under Section 125 CrPC.
Whether an interim maintenance order is quashable under Section 482 CrPC.
What is the appropriate remedy for an aggrieved person against an interim maintenance order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MANZOOR T.R
- respondent
FASIYA
- respondent
NAZRIN
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court