UDAYAKUMAR, AGED 54 YEARS, SEVEN SEAS BPO SERVICES (PVT) LTD., PULINATT BUILDING, OPPOSITE COCHIN SHIPYARD, M.G.ROAD, PERUMANOOR P.O., KOCHI-16, NOW AT KALABHAVAN ROAD, KOCHI-18.

¶9

BY ADVS. SMT. C.G.BINDU SMT. C.G.AJITHA SMT. SEEMA.E.GEORGE

¶10

RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDNETS/COMPLAINANT AND STATE:

¶11

1. C.K. UNNIKUTTAN, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. KUTTAPPAN, CHEEYADI HOSUE, PAZHANGANAD, KIZHAKKAMBALAM P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

¶12

2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM – 682 031.

¶13

R1 BY ADV. SRI. P.T.JOSE R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. SAREENA

¶14

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-092015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶15

Crl.MC.No. 4168 of 2015

¶16

APPENDIX

¶17

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS

¶18

ANNEXURE 1: CERTIFIED COPY OF THE PROTEST COMPLAINT LODGED BY THE IST RESPONDENT HEREIN BEFORE THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (ECONOMIC OFFENCES), ERNAKULAM NUMBERED AS C.C. NO.1128/2013.

¶19

ANNEXURE 2: TRUE COPY OF THE LABOUR CONTRACT WITH UMAIR ALI SANAD AL SHAHRANI.

¶20

ANNEXURE 3: TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF THE PROCEDURE LAID DOWN FOR SAUDI ARABIAN DRIVING LICENCE.

¶21

ANNEXURE 4: TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF THE PROCEDURE LAID DOWN FOR GETTING THE IQAMA.

¶22

ANNEXURE 5: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF UNDERTAKING ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

¶23

ANNEXURE 6: TRUE COPY OF THE LEDGER SHOWING THE RETURN TICKET DETAILS OF FLY WELL TOURS AND TRAVELS.

¶24

ANNEXURE 7: TRUE COPY OF THE SUMMONS ISSUED FROM ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (ECONOMIC OFFENCES), ERNAKULAM IN C.C.NO.1128/2013.

¶25

ANNEXURE 8: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 03.05.2013 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT AS CRL.M.P. NO.1233/2013 UNDER SECTIONS 190 AND 200 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE.

¶26

ANNEXURE 9: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE DEPOSITION OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN ANNEXURE-1 PROTEST COMPLAINT.

¶27

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS

NIL

//TRUE COPY//

P.A. TO JUDGE

B. KEMAL PASHA, J.

¶33

¶34

Crl. M.C. No. 4168 of 2015

¶35

Dated this the 4^th day of September, 2015

¶36

ORDER

¶37

Initially a crime was registered as Crime No. 246/2013 of Ernakulam Town South Police Station alleging offences punishable under Section 420 IPC and Section 24 (f) (g) of the Emmigration Act, 1983.

¶38

After investigation, the police has chosen to refer the matter. On the acceptance of the refer report, the 1^st respondent has filed a protest complaint before the court below. It seems that the cognizance have been taken by the court below on the protest complaint for the offences punishable under Section 420 IPC and Section 24 (f) (g) of the Emigration Act, 1983.

¶39

According to the petitioner who is the accused, the

¶40

Crl. M.C. No. 4168 of 2015

¶41

¶42

proceedings are unnecessary and there is nothing to rope the petitioner with any other offences.

¶43

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶44

the learned counsel for the 1st respondent.

¶45

It is a warrant trial of a private complaint and it has a long way to go. The petitioner will get enough opportunities at several stages to ventilate his grievance, if any. It is too premature at this stage to say whether the offences are sustainable or not as against the petitioner.

¶46

With liberty to approach appropriate forums at proper stages, this Crl.M.C is closed.

¶47

Sd/-

¶48

B. KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE

¶49

Udayakumar v. C.K.Unnikuttan

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Udayakumar v. C.K.Unnikuttan

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Ganesan Vs Mr.Kamaludeen

K.K.Haneefa Alias Muhammad Haneefa Vs State of Kerala

Suji K. Sudhakaran Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Sanjith Khan Vs State of Kerala

E.N.Krishnakumar Vs Jancy

Jayaprasad M.R. Vs State of Kerala