Suraj v. Sub Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
In a criminal miscellaneous case regarding seized crackers under the Explosives Act, 1984, the High Court directed the lower court to consider the petitioner's pending licence renewal application on merits expediently, within two months, and closed the current petition after observations.
What did the court decide?
The Criminal Misc. Case was closed after directing the lower court to expedite the petitioner's license renewal application.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA
WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/25TH BHADRA, 1937
Crl.MC.No. 3798 of 2015 ()
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 1753/2015 of J.M.F.C.-II, KOLLAM CRIME NO. 414/2015 OF KOLLAM EAST POLICE STATION , KOLLAM
PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED: ----------------------
SURAJ AGED 47 YEARS S/O.SREEDHARAN, RESIDING AT ANUSREE VEEDU GARDEN NAGAR-88, ASRAMAM CHEERY, KOLLAM EAST VILLAGE.
BY ADV. SRI.R.KISHORE
RESPONDENT(S):
1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOLLAM EAST POLICE STATION-691 001.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the prosecution must reveal the quantity of substances under Rule 9(5) of the Explosives Rules.
Whether the court below must expedite the hearing of the petitioner's pending licence renewal application under Section 239 Cr.P.C.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SURAJ
- respondent
SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOLLAM EAST POLICE STATION
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court