Rajesh v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
MONDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JULY 2015/15TH ASHADHA, 193
Crl.MC.No. 3568 of 2015 ()
--------------------------CP.NO. 26/2015 OF ADDL.CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
CRIME NO. 148/2015 OF PETTA POLICE STATION,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT
PETITIONER(S)/A1 TO A4, A6 TO A8 :
1. RAJESH, AGED 37 YEARS,S/O.SASI, T.C.13/948, KOLLOOR THOTTUVARAMBIL VEEDU, KANNANMOOLA, PUTHENPALAM, VANCHIYOOR VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. BINU, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O.RAJAPPAN,
3. SANTHOSH @ CHANTHU, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O.RAJU, T.C.13/778 (14), PPRA-64, KOLLOOR THOTTUVARAMBIL VEEDU, PUTHENPALAM, KANNAMOOLA WARD, VANCHIYOOR VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
4. SAJU, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.RAJENDRAN, VARUVILAKATHU VEEDU, KAVUVILA, CHENNILODE, PERMANENTLY RESIDING AT T.C.13/15, KOLLOOR THOTTUVARAMBIL VEEDU, PUTHENPALAM, KANNAMOOLA WARD, VANCHIYOOR VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
5. AJEESH,AGED 34 YEARS, S/O.VISHWANATHAN, T.C.76/2557, ARA 334, ANEESH BHAVAN, OOLANKUZHY, ANAYARA, KADAKAMPALLY VILLAGE,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
6. BINU KUMAR, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.THULASEEDARAN, MINI HOUSE, NEAR FCI, VILAYILKULAM, KAZHAKUTTOM, MENAMKULAM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
7. LAL, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.THANKAPPAN, CHITHAMBARAVILAKATHU VEEDU, MULLUVILA, ATTIPRA VILLAGE, KAZHAKUTTOM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2/-
-2-
Crl.MC.No. 3568 of 2015
RESPONDENT(S)/STATE, CW1 & CW2:
1. STATE OF KERALA,
2. ARUN, AGED 27 YEARS, VAYAL NIKATHIYA VEETIL,
3. MANU, AGED 27 YEARS, S/O.JOHNY,
R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.N.SURESH
R2 & R3 BY ADV. SRI.R.GOPAN
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
Crl.M.C.No.3568 Of 2015
Dated this the 6th day of July, 2015.
O R D E R
Sri.Shajin S.Hameed, learned counsel for the petitioners submits
that the petitioners are not pressing the Crl.M.C with liberty to invoke appropriate remedies in accordance with law.
In view of the above submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Crl.M.C is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty.
ALEXANDER THOMAS,
Judge.
bkn/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal miscellaneous petition will be allowed to proceed given that it was not pressed with liberty to discuss the matter.
RAJESH
BINU
SANTHOSH @ CHANTHU
SAJU
AJEESH
BINU KUMAR
ALEXANDER THOMAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court