Eramakk Veettil Puthiyakath Beevikutty v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners did not press the criminal miscellaneous case. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA
TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/21ST ASWINA, 1937
Crl.MC.No. 2685 of 2015 ()
CRL.R.P. 68/2014 of SESSIONS COURT, KOZHIKODE
CMP 5591/2011 of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE’S COURT-V, KOZHIKODE
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 & 2:
1. ERAMAKK VEETTIL PUTHIYAKATH BEEVIKUTTY, AGED 73 YEARS,
W/O.AHAMMEDKUTTY, RESIDING AT PALAYIL HOUSE, P.O.KARUVANTHIRUTHI, FEROKE, KOZHIKODE.
2. ERAMAKK VEETTIL PUTHIYAKATH IMBICHIKOYA, AGED 51 YEARS,
S/O.AHAMMEDKUTTY, RESIDING AT PALAYIL HOUSE, P.O.KARUVANTHIRUTHI, FEROKE, KOZHIKODE.
BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN
RESPONDENT/STATE AND COMPLAINANT:
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, HIGH COURT ROAD, ERNAKULAM.
2. KUNHAMMED, S/O.HASSAN HAJI, AGED 65 YEARS, RAMBIYA MANZIL, PUTTEKKAD P.O., FERODE, KOZHIKODE, PIN- 673 631.
R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.MAYA
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
DSV/21/10/15
B.KEMAL PASHA, J.
======================
Crl.M.C. No. 2685 of 2015
=======================
Dated this the 13th day of October, 2015
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not
pressing this Crl.M.C. Accordingly, this Crl.M.C. is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
B.KEMAL PASHA JUDGE
DSV/13/10/15
// True Copy //
P.A. To Judge
ERAMAKK VEETTIL PUTHIYAKATH BEEVIKUTTY
ERAMAKK VEETTIL PUTHIYAKATH IMBICHIKOYA
STATE OF KERALA
KUNHAMMED
B.KEMAL PASHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court