Dismissed
Saneesh Sathian v. State of Kerala
Kerala HCCrl.MC/2472/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA
TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/10TH BHADRA, 1937
Crl.MC.No. 2472 of 2015
C.C.NO.1845/2013 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, THRISSUR CRIME NO. 602/2013 OF TOWN EAST POLICE STATION, THRISSUR
PETITIONER(S)/1ST ACCUSED :
SANEESH SATHIAN, S/O.SATHIANATHAN, FRINGAPURATH HOUSE, “ANJANA”, MANNUMKADU LANE, CHEROOR P.O., THRISSUR-680 008, (NOW WORKING AT DUBAI).
BY ADVS.SRI.SANTHOSH P.PODUVAL SMT.R.RAJITHA
RESPONDENT(S)/STATE :
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 031.
*** ADDITIONAL R2 & R3 IMPLEADED**
2. VINOD KUMAR, S/O.GOVINDAN
3. SONY, W/O.VINODKUMAR, CHEMBIL HOUSE, PARAVATHANI, NEW BAZAR, EAST FORT P.O., THRISSUR- 680 001.
R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.SAREENA GEORGE ADDL.R2 & R3 BY ADVS. SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS
SMT.MISHAL M.DASAN
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Msd.
B.KEMAL PASHA, J.
................................................................ CRL. M.C. No. 2472 of 2015 ............................................................... Dated this the 1st day of September, 2015
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Crl.M.C. Permission is granted. Accordingly, this Crl.M.C is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE
ul/-
[True copy] P.S. to Judge
SANEESH SATHIAN
STATE OF KERALA
B.KEMAL PASHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court