The petitioner herein is the complainant in a prosecution brought under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. His complaint was returned by the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate Court – I, Thrissur on the ground of territorial jurisdiction, in view of the position recently settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. His contention is that the cheque in question is an 'at par' cheque which can be presented in any branch of the Bank, and so the cheque can be presented at any place where dishonour is intimated. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the time being, he would not like to make submissions on this issue. However he will be satisfied, if he is given some reasonable time to represent the complaint in the appropriate court. The complaint was returned by the court below on 10.11.2014. The period of 30 days has now expired. He came before this court on the bonafide belief that he will get orders in his favour on the ground that the cheque is an 'at par' cheque. Anyway, I am not inclined to go to the legal aspects at this stage, when the petitioner only wants some time to represent the complaint in the proper