Basheer v. the State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought release of seized vehicle and directed police to report seizure. Court held petitioner must approach Magistrate under Section 451 Cr.P.C. as police had already filed complaint.
What did the court decide?
Order closed; petitioner directed to approach learned Magistrate.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID
TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/26TH PHALGUNA, 1936
Crl.MC.No. 1349 of 2015 ()
PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:
BASHEER AGED 35 YEARS S/O.HYDRU, THRIKKULAM, EDAKKARA MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.BABU S. NAIR
RESPONDENT(S)/STATE & COMPLAINANT:
1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682 031.
2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN: 679 322.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner can claim custody of the seized vehicle directly from this court or must approach the learned Magistrate.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
BASHEER AGED 35 YEARS S/O.HYDRU
- respondent
THE STATE OF KERALA
Coram
P.UBAID
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court