V.Pappy v. K.Anil Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
This Court allowed a criminal appeal filed by the complainant assailing the acquittal order passed by the trial court. The trial court had held that there was no proof of the alleged act of trespassing and cutting trees.
What did the court decide?
The criminal appeal was dismissed without any merit.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN
MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/16TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937
CRL.A.No. 786 of 2006 ( )
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CC 46/2002 of J.M.F.C.-I,PATHANAMTHITTA DATED 31-10-2005
APPELLANT/COMPLAINANT:
V.PAPPY, ADENATH, VETTIPURAM, PATHANAMTHITTA.
BY ADVS.SRI.JOHN BRITTO SRI.C.A.RAJEEV
RESPONDENT/ACCUSED 1, 2, 5 AND STATE:
1. K.ANIL KUMAR, RAMAMANGALATHU VEEDU, PERINGAMALA, VETTIPURAM PATHANAMTHITTA.
2. PETER KUNJUMON, OTTAPLAVANANILKKUNNATHIL, POOVANPARAMURUP, VETTIPURAM PATHANAMTHITTA.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the order of acquittal of the accused persons by the trial court.
Whether the findings of the trial court regarding the credibility of the complainant's witness are perverse.
Whether there is sufficient ground to hold that the accused persons infringed the property rights of the complainant.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
V. Pappy
- respondent
K. Anil Kumar
- respondent
Peter Kunjumon
- respondent
Pradeep
- respondent
State of Kerala
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court