him, misusing the signed stamp paper a suit was filed through his brother and misusing one of the cheques, the present complaint was filed. Even in the chief examination PW1 had not stated that when amount was borrowed and when the cheque was issued. He had only stated that the accused issued Ext.P1 cheque in discharge of the amount of Rs.75,000/-due from him. In the reply notice Ext.P7 sent by the accused, he had categorically stated that he had only one transaction with the complainant and he had borrowed Rs.10,000/- on 12.11.2000 and later the amount was paid. At the time of borrowing the amount, two blank signed cheques and some blank signed revenue stamp papers were obtained and misusing the cheque, the complaint was filed. So it is clear from this that even at the time when he received the notice, he promptly sent reply stating the circumstances under which the cheque had come to the hands of the complainant. In spite of that, the complainant had not narrated the entire transaction in the complaint as to when the amount was paid and when the cheque was issued. But he only mentioned in the complaint that what is stated in the
