This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI
TUESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/13TH SRAVANA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 934 of 2015 (S)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.27513 OF 2012 DATED 29-01-2015
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN W.P.(C) :
P.BHARGHAVAN, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.LATE PACHAN, THANICKAL HOUSE, MUTTAM P.O., THODUPUZHA- 685 587
BY ADVS.SRI.V.MANOJ KUMAR SRI.IYPE JOSEPH
RESPONDENT(S)/2ND RESPONDENT W.P.(C) :
DR.S.BINDU,
AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE DIRECTOR, KIRTADS, GOLF LINK ROAD, CHEVAYUR, KOZHIKODE, KERALA- 673 017.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LALY VINCENT
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Msd.
Con.Case(C).No. 934 of 2015 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES :
ANNEXURE A1: CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 29.01.2015 IN W.P.(C).NO.27513 OF 2012 OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA.
ANNEXURE A2: TRUE COPY OF COVERING LETTER DATED 20.02.2015 ISSUED TO THE RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE A3: TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION DATED 15.06.2015 ALONG WITH ADDRESSES RECEIPT ISSUED BY DEPARTMENT OF POSTS INDIA, ERNAKULAM HIGH COURT POST OFFICE.
RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES :
ANNEXURE I: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 27.11.2012. ANNEXURE II: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 18.01.2013. ANNEXURE III: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 06.03.2013. ANNEXURE IV: TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTRANCE COMMISSIONER. ANNEXURE V: TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE VIGILANCE OFFICER. //TRUE COPY//
P.A.TO JUDGE.
Msd.
A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.
Cont. Case (C) No. 934 of 2015
Dated this the 4th day of August, 2015
J U D G M E N T
As there is substantial compliance, the contempt case is closed reserving the right of the petitioner to challenge the present order if he is really aggrieved, through appropriate proceedings as envisaged under law.
Sd/-
A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE
bka/-
P.BHARGHAVAN
DR.S.BINDU
A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
