In a contempt of court case, the court examined the petitioner's claim of non-compliance with a previous writ judgment. Finding no specific directions given in the cited judgment, the court held no contempt was discernible and closed the proceedings.
The contempt case is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/26TH JYAISHTA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 836 of 2015 (S)
NON COMPLIANCE OF JUDGMENT DATED 28/04/2015 IN WP(C).NO. 12834/2015.
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
SUNIL KUMAR K.C., KIZHEKKE CHALIL, MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O., KOZHIKODE.
BY ADV. SRI.STALIN PETER DAVIS.
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1. SRI.N. PRASANTH, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND CHAIRMAN, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE - 673 001.
2. SRI.P.H. ASARAF, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AND MEMBER, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE - 673 001.
3. SRI.NARAYANAN POTTY S.N., FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DEPUTY TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, SOUTH ZONE AND MEMBER, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE - 673 001.
4. SRI.K. PREMANDAN, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE - 673 001.
BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
Con.Case(C).No. 836 of 2015 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:-
ANNEXURE A1 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT ON MVAA NO.9/2015 DATED 06/05/2015. ANNEXURE A2 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.12834/2015 DATED 28/04/2015. ANNEXURE A3 COPY OF THE DISRESPECTED AND ILLEGAL ORDER DATED 05/05/2015 OF THE RESPONDENTS AGAINST JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:- NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
rs.
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
Contempt Case (Civil) No. 836 of 2015 (S)
Dated this the 16th day of June, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner claims that there is no compliance of Ext.A2 judgment. A reading of Ext.A2 judgment would indicate that there is absolutely no direction given therein. The writ petition was closed merely drawing the attention of the authority to the decision in P.M. Thomas
v. The Regional Transport Authority & Another -
2004(2) KLJ 451 .
No contempt is discernible. The contempt case is closed.
Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE
jjj
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there was non-compliance of the judgment dated 28/04/2015 warranting contempt proceedings.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
P.M. Thomas v. The Regional Transport Authority & AnotherReferred¶30
P.M. Thomas v. The Regional Transport Authority & Another - 2004(2) KLJ 451
Sunil Kumar K.C.
N. Prasanth
P.H. Asaraf
Narayanan Potty S.N.
K. Premandan
K.Vinod Chandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
