Anil v. P.S.Prathapan
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court addressed a contempt petition challenging an order passed by the respondent. It directed the petitioner to challenge the order in the appropriate manner and closed the contempt proceeding.
What did the court decide?
Contempt proceeding closed; petitioner at liberty to challenge the impugned order.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
TUESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JULY 2015/23RD ASHADHA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 784 of 2015 (S)
-------------------------------------------THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.14435/2015 DATED 12-05-2015.
PETITIONER(S):
P. ANIL, AGED 44 YEARS, SON OF K.PURUSHOTHAMAN, T. NO.051675, TECHNICIAN GRADE C, PPP (M), KMML, SANKARAMANGALAM, CHAVARA, KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON GOMEZ.
RESPONDENT(S):
P.S. PRATHAPAN, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (M), KMML (TP UNIT), SANKARAMANGALAM, CHAVARA P.O., KOLLAM, PIN- 691 583.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's grievance regarding an order is proper for a contempt proceeding.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P. ANIL
- respondent
P.S. PRATHAPAN
Coram
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court