P.P.Joseph v. M.Moidunnikutty
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt case concerning compliance of a judgment in a connected writ petition where the respondent panchayat claimed disposal of the appeal via resolution, leading to closure of the contempt proceedings with rights to challenge reserved.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed reserving right to respondent to challenge resolution, if aggrieved.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI
MONDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JULY 2015/29TH ASHADHA, 1937
CON.CASE(C).NO. 746 OF 2015 (S)
[IN RELATION TO THE JUDGMENT DATED 10-04-2015 IN W.P(C).NO.27525/2013 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT]
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN W.P.(C)NO.27525 OF 2013:
P.P.JOSEPH, AGED 46 YEARS S/O.PUNNOOSE, POOCHAKKATTIL HOUSE, BRAHMAMANGALAM P.O., CHEMBU VILLAGE, VAIKOM TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.JOBI JOSE KONDODY.
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.2 IN W.P.(C)NO.27525 OF 2013:
M.MOIDUNNIKUTTY, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE SECRETARY, CHEMBU GRAMA PANCHAYAT, BRAHMAMANGALAM P.O., VAIKOM TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686 614.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.P. Joseph
- respondent
M. Moidunnikutty
Coram
A.V. Ramakrishna Pillai
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court