Contempt case proceedings where the Court accepted that the petitioner complied with the interim order in W.P.(C). 2669/2015; no substantive issue remained to be adjudicated.
The Contempt Case is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/4TH CHAITHRA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 320 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).2669/2015
AGAINST THE ORDER IN WP(C) 2669/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 27-01-2015
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
RAM NIWAS SINGH, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O JANG BAHADUR SINGH, BUSINESS, RESIDING AT T.C.13/462/1, B-9, PILLAVEEDU NAGAR, KESAVADASAPURAM, PATTOM.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-696 004.
BY ADVS.SRI.NAIR AJAY KRISHNAN SRI.R.T.PRADEEP
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT:
PADMAKUMAR,
AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN, SECRETARY IN CHARGE, CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
R BY SRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR,SC,TVPM CORPORATION SRI. N. NANDAKUMARA MENON, SC
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 320 of 2015
: 2 :
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE I : TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 27.01.2015 IN W.P.(C) NO. 2669/2015 BY THE SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.
ANNEXURE II : TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 30.01.2015 REGARDING THE ACCEPTANCE OF ANNEXURE -I.
RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE.
rv
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
---------------------------------Contempt Case (C) No. 320 of 2015 in W.P. (C) No. 2669 of 2015
---------------------------------Dated this the 25th day of March, 2015.
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned Senior Counsel for the respondent, has represented that the direction of this Court in Annexure I judgment has
been complied with.
Having regard to the submissions made across the Bar, this Court is of the opinion that nothing survives in the contempt case to be adjudicated upon. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed.
sd/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JUDGE.
rv
W.P.(C). No. -2-
RAM NIWAS SINGH
PADMAKUMAR
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
