Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Parambath Bhaskaran Vs P.K.Preman — Contempt of Court | Kerala HC (2015)

Home
Kerala HC
2015
Parambath Bhaskaran Vs P.K.PremanParambath Bhaskaran v. P.K.Preman

Dismissed

Parambath Bhaskaran v. P.K.Preman

Kerala HC6 Feb 2015Con.Case(C)/31/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this contempt case, the court dismissed the proceeding as closed on the ground of substantial compliance.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI

FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/17TH MAGHA, 1936

Con.Case(C).No. 31 of 2015 (S) ------------------------------WP(C) 10500/2014 DATED 16.07.2014

PETITIONER:

PARAMBATH BHASKARAN AGED 55 YEARS S/O.THAMBAYI, CHUNDA, KANNAPURAM PO MOTTAMMAL, KANNUR DISTRICT

BY ADV. SRI.K.RAJESH SUKUMARAN

RESPONDENT:

P.K.PREMAN THE SECRETARY, KANNAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH PO CHERUKUNNU, KANNUR 670 110

R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN R1 BY ADV. SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether the contempt case is closed due to substantial compliance even though the decision was not communicated to the petitioner.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Parambath Bhaskaran
respondent
P.K. Preman, Secretary, Kannapuram Grama Panchayath

Coram

AI extract

A.V. Ramakrishna Pillai

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Kerala HC
Decided on: 6 Feb 2015 · February
Registered: 8 Jan 2015
Case no.: Con.Case(C)/31/2015

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from A.v.ramakrishna Pillai

A.T. Rejimon Vs Roads and Bridges Development Corporation of Kerala Ltd.
5 Feb 2015
M v Jose Vs Vengola Grama Panchayath
5 Feb 2015
Nalini Vs Porkulam Grama Panchayath
5 Feb 2015
Dr. Vijo George Vs Union of India
6 Feb 2015

Cite this judgement

Parambath Bhaskaran v. P.K.Preman, Con.Case(C)/31/2015 (KL), decided on 6 February 2015.

The High Court of Kerala publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

A.V. Ramakrishna Pillai

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Issue for consideration

Whether the contempt case is closed due to substantial compliance even though the decision was not communicated to the petitioner.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The court held that the contempt case is closed. The respondent filed a submission that notice was given to the petitioner in compliance with the earlier judgment, the petitioner was heard, and a decision was taken, amounting to substantial compliance, despite the decision not being communicated.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Con.Case(C).No. 31 of 2015 (S)

APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS

ANNEXURE I: CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 16.7.2014 IN WP(C) 10500/2014.

ANNEXURE II: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD, ACKNOWLEDGING THE RECEIPT BY THE RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:

ANNEXURE R1:- TRUE COPY OF THE HEARING NOTE DATED 10.10.2014 TO THE PETITIONER AND OTHERS.

ANNEXURE R1(A):- TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE COMPLAINT REGISTER WHICH INCLUDES THE MINUTES OF THE HEARING OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 21.10.2014.

ANNEXURE R1(B):-TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE MINUTES OF THE PANCHAYATH DATED 19.11.2014.

ANNEXURE R1(C):- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT ON 3.2.2015.

TRUE COPY

PA TO JUDGE

Scl.

A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

Cont. Case (C) No. 31 of 2015

Dated this the 6^th day of February, 2015.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the respondent submitted that in compliance of the directions given by this Court in the judgment, notice has been given to the petitioner and he was heard and a decision was taken, though the decision was not communicated to the petitioner. As there was substantial compliance, the contempt case is closed.

Sd/-

A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE

Scl.

CNR

KLHC010103272015

Topic

Contempt of Court

Bench

A.v.ramakrishna Pillai

Disposal

CLOSED

Ananya Vipin & Anagha Vipin Vs State of Kerala

6 Feb 2015

Dalmia Cement (Bharath) Limited Vs the Union of India

6 Feb 2015