Bindu K. Unnithan v. Shri.P.S.Mathew
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition alleging non-compliance with a High Court judgment directing respondents to enable the petitioner to claim full time benefits, the Court held that since the respondents had already passed the necessary order sanctioning the benefits, the directive was complied with, and no willful contempt existed.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed with no finding of willful contempt.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
TUESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE 2015/12TH JYAISHTA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 254 of 2015 (S) IN WA.1710/2009
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 24/10/2014 IN WA 1710/2009 AGAINST THEJUDGMENT IN WP(C) 32809/2008 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 29/06/2009
PETITIONER :
BINDU K. UNNITHAN AGED 39 YEARS D/O.KUMARAN UNNITHAN, LOWER GRADE HINDI TEACHER S.R.V.U.P SCHOOL, PERUMPULICKAL, MANNAM NAGAR P.O PANDALAM, RESIDING AT SREE BHAVAN, PONGALADI PARANTHAL P.O, PANDALAM.
BY ADV. SRI.B.UNNIKRISHNA KAIMAL
RESPONDENTS :
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the direction to pass orders enabling the petitioner to claim full time benefits was complied with.
Whether there exists willful contempt in not fully complying with the earlier judgment after passing the requisite sanctioning order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Bindu K. Unnithan
- respondent
P.S. Mathew
- respondent
N. Prabhakumari
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court