V.a.Francis v. Anil X. IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt proceeding, the Court noted a submission that the respondent had complied with directions, leading to the dismissal of the contempt petition.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/8TH MAGHA, 1936
Con.Case(C).No. 24 of 2015 (S)
WP(C) 24656/2014 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT.
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN W.P.(C):
V.A.FRANCIS, S/O.AUGUSTINE, AGED 47 YEARS, GENERAL CONVENER, COCHIN METRO BAR VIRUDHA SAMITI, LABOUR COLONY ROAD, THAMMANAM, ERNAKULAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.SALIM V.S.
SRI.SHANAVAS.S SRI.H.NUJUMUDEEN SRI.P.V.JEEVESH
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT IN W.P:
ANIL X. IAS, S/O.KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 680 025.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.A. Francis
- respondent
Anil X.
Coram
A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court