Sathya Narayanan Embranthiri v. K.R.Haridas
Case brief
What is this about?
Counsels submitted respondents official duty caused delay. Court held time frame ran from 11.11.2015 hearing. Contempt petition closed due to circumstances.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/22ND KARTHIKA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 1692 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).31059/2015
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 31059/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 13-10-2015
PETITIONER(S):
SATHYA NARAYANAN EMBRANTHIRI, AGED 52 YEARS S/O. VASUDEVAN EMBRANTHIRI, VADAKEMADATHIL ISHWARIYA LANE, MOOKAMBIKA ROAD, NORTH PARAVOOR 683020
BY ADV. SRI.B.RAMACHANDRAN
RESPONDENT(S):
K.R.HARIDAS (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) SPECIAL DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER, COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD ROUND NORTH, THRISSUR 680 020
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay in filing the contempt petition filed the day after hearing.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sathya Narayanan Embraithiri
- respondent
K.R. Haridas
Coram
K. Vinod Chandran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court