Disposed
V.Raveendran v. Varghese K.Daniel
Kerala HCCon.Case(C)/1375/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/16TH MAGHA, 1936
Con.Case(C).No.1375 of 2014 (S)
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
V.RAVEENDRAN,AGED 58 YEARS, KUTTOTH METHAL HOUSE,KUNNATHARA P.O., KOZHIKODE (DT).
BY ADVS.SRI.SANTHARAM.P SMT.REKHA ARAVIND SMT.T.S.REMYA
RESPONDENT/3RD RESPONDENT:
VARGHESE K.DANIEL,AGE NOT KNOWN, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN, THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, REGIONAL OFFICE,'BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN', PATTOM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695001.
R1 BY SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SENIOR ADVOCATE.) ADV.SMT.T.N.GIRIJA, SC,EPF ORGANISATION
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
pk
Con.Case(C).No.1375 of 2014 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE 1:CERTIFIED COPYOF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19.8.2014 IN W.P NO.6247/2011.
ANNEXURE 2:TRUE COPY OF THE FORM 10D DATED 8.9.2014 RESUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
ANNEXURE 3:TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND DRAFT DATED 12.9.2014.
ANNEXURE 4:TRUE COPY OF THE REJECTION LETTER DATED 16.10.2014.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.S. TO JUDGE
pk
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
---------------------------------Cont. Case (C) No. 1375 of 2014 in W.P. (C) No. 6247 of 2011
Dated this the 5th day of February, 2015.
JUDGMENT
Both the learned counsel have reported that consequent to the filing of the Contempt Case, the grievance of the petitioner stood redressed. Recording the said submission of
the respective counsel for the petitioner and also the respondent, this Court closes the Contempt Case as having not survived for consideration.
sd/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JUDGE.
/True Copy/
P.A to Judge.
rv
W.P.(C). No. -2-
V. RAVEENDRAN
THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court