In a contempt of court case, the court accepted the petitioner's submission that the directions in an earlier judgment had been complied with and ordered the case to be closed, leaving the petitioner liberty to challenge the impugned order.
Contempt case closed; petitioner at liberty to challenge the prior order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/15TH ASWINA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 1371 of 2015 (S)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.6214/2015, DATED 26-02-2015
PETITIONER(S) :
TIJU K.JOHN, AGED 38 YEARS, WIFE OF SIBY, H.S.S.T.(JR), MATHEMATICS, S.H.MOUNT HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KOTTAYAM, RESIDING AT THARAPPEL HOUSE, KIDANGOOR, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.R.DIVAKARAN
RESPONDENT(S)/1ST RESPONDENT :
DR.K.ELLANGOVAN, SECRETARY, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.C.K.SHERIN
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Msd.
Con.Case(C).No. 1371 of 2015 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES :
ANNEXURE A1: THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN W.P.(C).NO.6214/2015 DATED 26.02.2015 OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA.
ANNEXURE A2: A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 06.04.2015. ANNEXURE A2(A): A TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT DATED 06.04.2015. ANNEXURE A3: A TRUE COPY OF LEGAL NOTICE DATED 08.08.2015. ANNEXURE A3(A): TRUE COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD SIGNED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 17.08.2015.
RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES :
NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A.TO JUDGE.
Msd.
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
==================
Cont. Case No. 1371 of 2015
==================
Dated this the 7th day of October, 2015 J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that directions in Ext.P3 judgment has been complied with. Accordingly, this
Contempt case is closed. The petitioner is at liberty to challenge the order.
sd/-
sab
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE
TIJU K.JOHN
DR.K.ELLANGOVAN
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
