Disposed

V.N.Sarada v. Vinu Francis

Kerala HC15 Jan 2015Con.Case(C)/1347/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala disposed of a contempt case where the petitioner alleged she had not received an order complying with earlier directions. The court directed the respondent to serve the copy subsequently and closed the contempt proceedings.

What did the court decide?

The contempt case was closed; the Secretary of the Municipality was directed to serve the petitioner with the compliance order.

V.N.Sarada Vs Vinu Francis — Contempt of Court | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/25TH POUSHA, 1936

¶5

Con.Case(C).No. 1347 of 2014 ()

¶6

WP(C) 14734/2013 of THIS HONOURABLE COURT

¶7

PETITIONER :

¶8

-------------------

¶9

V.N.SARADA, AGED 78 YEARS, D/O.LATE NARAYANA IYER, OM NAMO NARAYANA, 8/48 VETTAKKORUMAN KAVU, KALPATHY P.O., PALAKKAD PIN:678 003.

¶10

BY ADVS.SRI.K.V.SOHAN SMT.SREEJA SOHAN.K. SRI.ROVIN RODRIGUES

¶11

RESPONDENT NO.2 :

¶12

-----------------------------

¶13

VINU FRANCIS, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN, SECRETARY, PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY, PALAKKAD - PIN: 678 001.

¶14

R1 BY ADV. SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.S.APPU

¶15

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

¶17

Con.Case(C).No. 1347 of 2014 ()

¶18

APPENDIX

¶19

PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES :

¶20

ANNEXURE 1: COPY OF THE LETTER SENT BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT, DT 17/06/2014.

¶21

ANNEXURE 2: COPY OF THE POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT, DT 18/7/2014 EVIDENCING RECEIPT OF ANNEXURE - 1 ALONG WITH COPY OF THE JUDGMENT.

¶22

RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES : NIL.

//TRUE COPY//

P.A. TO JUDGE

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

¶27

*****************************************************

¶28

Contempt Case (Civil) No.1347 of 2014

¶29

***************************************************** Dated this the 15^th day of January, 2015

¶30

JUDGMENT

¶31

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the respondent has already complied with the directions of this Court in W.P.(C) No.14734/2013 and passed an order. The petitioner submits that she has not received the order. Therefore, the petitioner shall appear before the Secretary of

¶32

the Municipality on 28.1.2015 at 11 a.m. The secretary of the

¶33

Municipality shall serve a copy of the order.

¶34

Accordingly, the contempt case is closed.

¶35

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE

¶36

V.N.Sarada v. Vinu Francis

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.N.Sarada v. Vinu Francis

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajayakumar G Vs Village Officer

V a Shihabudheen Vs the State of Kerala

Krishnan Govindan Vs State of Kerala

Babeesh V.T Vs Bhattacharyya

Suresan.a. Vs N.N.Jamuna

The Secretary Vs Nissar K.A