Allowed

A.G.C.Mustafa v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC7 Jul 2015Bail Appl./9097/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Kerala High Court allowed an application for anticipatory bail. The court imposed conditions requiring the petitioner to appear for interrogation, refrain from similar offences, and not intimidate witnesses, with a requirement of appearance on Saturdays for two months post-release.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed on execution of bond for Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions regarding interrogation, Saturday appearances, and non-interference with witnesses.

A.G.C.Mustafa Vs State of Kerala — Bail and Remand | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.JYOTHINDRANATH

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JULY 2015/16TH ASHADHA, 1937

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 9097 of 2014

¶6

CRIME NO. 977/2014 OF CHANDERA POLICE STATION, KASARGOD DISTRICT

¶7

PETITIONER(S)/1ST ACCUSED :

¶8

A.G.C.MUSTAFA, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.AHAMED HAJI, ROYAL ELECTRICALS, BUS STAND, TRIKARIPUR, KASARAGOD DISTRICT.

¶9

BY ADVS.SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS SRI.K.V.SREE VINAYAKAN SRI.K.M.MUHAMMED HUSSAIN

¶10

RESPONDENT(S)/STATE :

¶11

THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTING S.H.O CHANDERA POLICE STATION, KASARAGOD DISTRICT- 671 121.

¶12

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.M.MADHUBEN

¶13

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶14

Msd.

¶15

K.P. JYOTHINDRANATH, J.

¶16

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B.A. No.9097 of 2014

¶17

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 7^th day of July, 2015

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

This is an application filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶20

The facts in a nutshell is that a crime is registered upon a complaint of one Legal Officer, IPR of Finolex Cables Limited. The offence alleged is under Sections 420, 483, 486 of IPC as well as under Sections 103, 104 and 107 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

¶21

After hearing the learned Public Prosecutor and after considering the fact that the crime number is of the year 2014 and so far the accused is not arrested, the following orders passed:

¶22

The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer within 10 days of this order. On such appearance, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to interrogate the petitioner. After interrogation, if the police officer feels that arrest is necessary, he is at liberty to arrest the petitioner. Thereafter, if any recovery is necessary, that also can be made. Thereafter the petitioner shall be

¶23

B.A. No.9097 of 2014

¶24

-2-

¶25

released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- with two solvent sureties for the like amount to the satisfaction of the officer concerned.

¶26

After release on bail, the petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer on all Saturdays in between 10 a.m and 12 noon for a period of two months.

¶27

The petitioner shall not commit similar offences during the bail period.

¶28

The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the witnesses.

¶29

On the above conditions, this anticipatory bail application is allowed.

¶30

Sd/-

¶31

K.P. JYOTHINDRANATH JUDGE

¶32

//True copy//

¶33

P.A. TO JUDGE

¶34

shg/

A.G.C.Mustafa v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.G.C.Mustafa v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prasanth Vs State of Kerala

Eldho Paul Vs State of Kerala

V.V Govindan Vs State of Kerala

Jayakrishnan P. Vs State of Kerala

Ajay Lazar E.R. Vs State of Kerala

Thankachan @ Varghese Vs State of Kerala