Allowed

Ramakrishnan Unnithan v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC6 Nov 2015Bail Appl./6324/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Kerala High Court granted pre-arrest bail to three petitioners charged with offences under Sections 294(b), 323, 324, 506(1), 354, 354A and 34 of the IPC, subject to conditions regarding surrender, bond execution, and conduct.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted to the petitioners subject to conditions of surrender within two weeks, execution of bond and sureties, appearance for interrogation, and no intimidation of witnesses.

Ramakrishnan Unnithan Vs State of Kerala — Bail and Remand | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/15TH KARTHIKA, 1937

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 6324 of 2015

¶6

CRIME NO. 1119/2015 OF NOORANADU POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA

¶7

PETITIONER(S)/A1 TO 3:

¶8

-----------------------------------

¶9

1. RAMAKRISHNAN UNNITHAN @ RAMAKRISHNAN, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O. JANARDHANAN PILLAI, MANGALATHU VEEDU, WARD III, PALAMEL PANCHAYATH, ULAVUKADU, PALAMEL VILLAGE,

¶10

NOORANADU.

¶11

2. RAHUL KRISHNAN, AGED 22 YEARS, S/O. RAMAKRISHNAN UNNITHAN, MANGALATHU VEEDU, WARD III, PALAMEL PANCHAYATH, ULAVUKADU, PALAMEL VILLAGE,

¶12

NOORANADU.

¶13

3. JANARDHANAN PILLAI @ JANARDHANAN UNNITHAN, AGED 85 YEARS, S/O. NARAYANAN PILLAI, MANGALATHU VEEDU, WARD III, PALAMEL PANCHAYATH, ULAVUKADU, PALAMEL VILLAGE,

¶14

NOORANADU.

¶15

BY ADVS.SRI.R.SUNIL KUMAR SMT.A.SALINI LAL

¶16

RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT:

¶17

------------------------------------------------

¶18

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶19

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.R.REMA

¶20

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶21

msv/

¶22

A. HARIPRASAD, J.

¶23

Bail Appl. No.6324 of 2015

¶24

Dated this the 6^th day of November 2015

¶25

O R D E R

¶26

Bail application filed under Sec.438 Cr.P.C.

¶27

Petitioners are accused nos.1 to 3 in Crime

¶28

No.1119 of 2015 of Nooranadu Police station, registered for the offences punishable under Secs.294(b), 323, 324, 506(1), 354 and 354A read with Sec.34 of the Indian Penal Code. Prosecution case in short is that, on 29.05.2015 at about 9.00 a.m., there was a scuffle between the defacto complainant and the accused persons. In the incident, the above said offences were committed.

¶29

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶30

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that there is a civil case pending between the petitioner and the defacto complainant. Annexure-1 is the plaint.

¶31

Considering the nature of allegations, pre

¶32

Bail Appl. No.6324 of 2015 2

¶33

arrest bail is granted to the petitioners with the following conditions.

¶34

The petitioners shall surrender before

¶35

the investigating officer within a period of two weeks and submit themselves for interrogation.

¶36

In the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on their executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like

¶37

sum to the satisfaction of the investigating officer.

¶38

The petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation as and when directed by him in writing.

¶39

The petitioners shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses, nor shall they tamper with the evidence.

¶40

In case of violation of any of the above

¶41

Bail Appl. No.6324 of 2015 3

¶42

conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with law without referring the matter to this Court.

Sd/-

A. HARIPRASAD

JUDGE

NS/06/11/2015

/ True Copy / P.A. To Judge

Ramakrishnan Unnithan v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramakrishnan Unnithan v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prasad Vs State of Kerala

Gopakumar Vs State of Kerala

Tichu Tomy Vs the State of Kerala

Fareed Khan Ponnelam Vs Station House Officer, Kalpeni Police Station

Ramesan K. Vs State of Kerala

K.R. Raju Vs State of Kerala