Dismissed

Nizar v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC10 Sept 2015Bail Appl./5159/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A three-judge pair (Accused 5-7) filed an anticipatory bail application for offences under the IPC, Arms Act, and Kerala Police Act. The High Court of Kerala refused bail, directing the petitioners to surrender for interrogation within two weeks before approaching any Magistrate for regular bail.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail refused with direction to surrender for interrogation within two weeks.

Nizar Vs State of Kerala — Bail and Remand | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/19TH BHADRA, 1937

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 5159 of 2015

¶6

CRIME NO. 1712/2015 OF MATHILAKOM POLICE STATION, THhRISSUR

¶7

PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED 5 TO 7:

¶8

1. NIZAR, AGED 24 YEARS, S/O.HUSSAIN, VAYANATTUPADI HOUSE KAIPAMANGALAM VILLAGE, KAIPAMANGALAM DESOM

¶9

2. ALTHAHIR, AGED 26 YEARS,

¶10

S/O.HUSSAIN, VAYANATTUPADI HOUSE, KAIPAMANGALAM VILLAGE, KAIPAMANGALAM DESOM.

¶11

3. ANZAD, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O.SALIM, MATHILAKATH HOUSE, KAIPAMANGALAM VILLAGE, KAIPAMANGALAM DESOM

¶12

BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR

¶13

RESPONDENT(S):

¶14

1. STATE OF KERALA, REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶15

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MATHILAKAM POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

¶16

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.T.Y.LALIZA

¶17

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

msv/

¶19

A.HARIPRASAD, J.

¶20

B.A. No.5159 of 2015 -------------------------------------Dated this the 10^th day of September, 2015

¶21

ORDER

¶22

Accused 5 to 7 in Crime No.1712 of 2015 of Mathilakam Police

¶23

Station involved in offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148 and 506(ii) read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 117(e) of the Kerala Police Act seek anticipatory bail.

¶24

Prosecution case, in short, is that they were seen found in the wee hours of 31.07.2015 armed with weapons.

¶25

Heard both sides.

¶26

Considering the nature of allegations, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. They shall in two weeks surrender before the Investigating Officer and submit themselves for interrogation. Thereafter the Investigating Officer shall produce them before the learned Magistrate having jurisdiction on the same day. The petitioners are free to move for bail before the learned Magistrate. In that event, the learned Magistrate shall consider the application on merits as expeditiously as possible.

¶27

The application is disposed of.

¶28

A. HARIPRASAD, JUDGE.

¶29

cks

Nizar v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nizar v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Babukuttan Vs State Ofkerala

Vimal Kumar T.V. Vs State of Kerala

Eldhose Mathews, S/O.Mathews Vs State of Kerala

Anil John Zacharias Vs State of Kerala

Rajeshkumar Vs State of Kerala

Nandakumara Prabhu Vs State of Kerala