Dismissed

Rajesh v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC9 Sept 2015Bail Appl./4749/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This was a pre-arrest bail application under Section 438 CrPC regarding offences under the IPC. The High Court of Kerala held that the petitioners were not entitled to anticipatory bail and directed them to surrender to the Investigating Officer for interrogation within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to surrender before Investigation Officer within two weeks for interrogation and thereafter move for regular bail.

Rajesh Vs State of Kerala — Cheating and Forgery | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/18TH BHADRA, 1937

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 4749 of 2015 ()

¶6

CRIME NO. 881/2015 OF KOLLAM WEST POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT

¶7

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 & 2 :

¶8

1. RAJESH AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. RAJESEKHARAN PILLAI, KAMALALAYAM, KOTTACKAKOM PERINAD P.O., KOLLAM.

¶9

2. HAZEENA AGED 41 YEARS, D/O. FATHIMA BEEVI, KAMALALAYAM, KOTTACKAKOM PERINAD P.O., KOLLAM.

¶10

BY ADVS.SRI.V.JAYAPRADEEP SRI.V.JAYADHAR

¶11

RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT :

¶12

STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE SUB-INSPECTOR, KOLLAM WEST PS THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA

¶13

*ADDL. R2 IMPLEADED

¶14

----------------------------------

¶15

*ADDL.R2. SURESH BABU

¶16

AGED 45 YEARS, S/O. SUNDARESWARAN SKYLINE GAMET – 7C, K.T. GOPALAN ROAD KOTTULI VILLAGE, KOZHIKODE TALUK-673 110.

¶17

*ADDL. R2 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN CRL.M.A. NO. 8793/2015 DATED 09/09/2015.

¶18

R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. LALIZA T.Y.

¶19

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶20

¶21

A.HARIPRASAD, J.

¶22

B.A. No.4749 of 2015

¶23

Dated this the 9^th day of September, 2015

¶24

ORDER

¶25

Petitioners seek pre-arrest bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure apprehending arrest in Crime No.881 of 2015 of Kollam West Police Station. They are involved in offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 476, 468 and 471 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶26

It is alleged that the petitioners with an intention to gain unlawfully as the president and secretary of the Kollam District Self Entrepreneurs' Development Welfare Co-operative Society Ltd. received cash deposit worth rupees five lakhs from the defacto complainant and issued two receipts. On maturity, the amount could not be realised. Hence, the case is registered against the petitioners.

¶27

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶28

It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the society was expecting financial assistance from NABARD, but it could not be obtained in time and therefore, the amount could not be repaid. In answer to this contention, learned Prosecutor submitted that amounts were

¶29

BA No.4749/2015 2

¶30

collected from the depositors with an intention to cheat them.

¶31

All these aspects will have to be brought out in a thorough investigation. Considering the nature of allegations, I am of the view that the petitioners are not entitled to get anticipatory bail. They shall surrender before the Investigating Officer within two weeks from today and submit themselves for interrogation. The Investigating Officer shall produce them before the learned Magistrate having jurisdiction on the date of surrender itself. Thereafter, the petitioners are free to move for regular bail before the learned Magistrate. In that event, the learned Magistrate shall consider the application as expeditiously as possible on merits.

¶32

The application is disposed of.

¶33

A. HARIPRASAD, JUDGE.

¶34

cks

Rajesh v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.T.Pazhani Vs State of Kerala

Faisal Vs Sub Inspector of Police

Sharafudeen Vs State of Kerala

Babukuttan Vs State Ofkerala

Vimal Kumar T.V. Vs State of Kerala

Eldhose Mathews, S/O.Mathews Vs State of Kerala