Allowed

P.C.Ajith Kumar v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC2 Dec 2015Bail Appl./4510/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Kerala High Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused in a case involving alleged misappropriation of diesel. The court imposed conditions including appearance for interrogation and periodic reporting, ultimately allowing the application.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed on conditions of interrogation appearance, periodic reporting, passport surrender, and cooperation with summons.

P.C.Ajith Kumar Vs State of Kerala — Cheating and Forgery | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.JYOTHINDRANATH

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/11TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 4510 of 2015 ()

¶6

------------------------------CRIME NO. 530/2015 OF KASABA POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT

¶7

APPLICANT/ACCUSED:

¶8

P.C.AJITH KUMAR, AGED 30 YEARS, S/O.CHANDRAN, KAZHU KUNNAMKALAM, THIRUVALATHUR P.O., KODUMBU, PALAKKAD.

¶9

BY ADV. SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)

¶10

RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:

¶11

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶12

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. V.H.JASMINE

¶13

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶14

sts

¶15

K.P. JYOTHINDRANATH, J.

¶16

== == == == == == == == == == == B.A.No. 4510 of 2015

¶17

== == == == == == == == == == == Dated this the 2^nd day of December, 2015

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.530 of 2015 of Kasaba Police Station which is registered for an offence under Section 420 of Indian Penal Code . When the application came up for hearing, the counsel for the petitioner submitted before me that petitioner is the telecoms supporter of the Idea Cellular Limited Company and the prosecution case is that he had misappropriated an amount of `9,13,000/- by way of swiping out excessive 16,557 liters of diesel using the petrol cads entrusted by the company.

¶20

It is the submission that no stretch of imagination can say that he had committed an offence under Section 420 of Indian Penal Code. It is also submitted before me that as per the prosecution case, diesel that is to be used for filling cars and other equipments are misappropriated.

¶21

B.A.No. 4510 of 2015

¶22

--2--

¶23

It is submitted that the above referred cars of the company are actually in the possession and control of Assistant Manager of the very same company at Palakkad Branch. It is also the submission that when the vehicle for which the diesel has to be used is in the possession of the Manager, it cannot be said that petitioner is the person, who misappropriated the amount or diesel. It is submitted that the petitioner is now made a scape goat in the case.

¶24

I heard the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶25

Prosecutor submitted before me that here is a case

¶26

where company believed the person and entrusted the petrol cads and the said cad is used to swipe out diesel. Under such circumstances, an offence under Section 420 will lie.

¶27

After hearing both counsel, I feel that the following order can be passed.

¶28

(i). The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer within 10days from the

¶29

--3--

¶30

B.A.No. 4510 of 2015

¶31

date of this order. On such appearance, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to interrogate the petitioner. After interrogation, if the police officer feels that arrest is necessary, he is at liberty to arrest the petitioner. Thereafter, if any recovery is necessary that also can be made. Thereafter, the petitioner shall be released on bail on executing a bond for `25,000/- with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the officer concerned.

¶32

(ii). After release on bail the petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer on all Saturdays in between 10.00a.m. and 12 noon for a period of two months.

¶33

(iii). If the petitioner is having a passport, a copy of the same along with the original shall be produced before the Investigating Officer at the time of surrender. After comparison, the original shall be returned to the petitioner. If the petitioner is not having

¶34

--4--

¶35

B.A.No. 4510 of 2015

¶36

a passport, he shall swear an affidavit to that effect and produce the same before the Investigating Officer. It shall be kept in the case diary by the Investigating Officer.

¶37

(iv). Petitioner shall not commit any offence during bail period.

¶38

(v). Petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the witnesses.

¶39

(vi). It is made clear that if an application under Section 311A of the Code of Criminal Procedure is filed before the concerned Magistrate, the petitioner shall co-operate with the same.

¶40

On the above conditions, this anticipatory bail application is allowed.

¶41

Sd/K.P.JYOTHINDRANATH JUDGE

¶42

skr

¶43

B.A.No. 4510 of 2015

¶44

--5--

P.C.Ajith Kumar v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.C.Ajith Kumar v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jithu Vs N.D.Vijayakumari

Ali Vs State of Kerala

V.G.George Vs State of Kerala

Sreeram S.K Vs State of Kerala

Sanal @ Anil Vs State of Kerala

Jamsheer Thoombath Vs State of Kerala