Disposed

Muneer Puthiya Patillath v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC17 Sept 2015Bail Appl./4047/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Kerala disposed of a pre-arrest bail application by directing the accused to surrender before the Judicial First Class Magistrate at Haripad within one month. Upon surrender, bail will be considered expeditiously on merits.

What did the court decide?

Directed petitioner to surrender before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Haripad, within one month to seek bail on merits.

Muneer Puthiya Patillath Vs State of Kerala — Bail and Remand | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/26TH BHADRA, 1937

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 4047 of 2015

¶6

CC.NO.35/2005(L.P.C.46/2007) OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT - I, HARIPAD.

¶7

PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

¶8

MUNEER PUTHIYA PATILLATH, S/O.RABIA, WEAVERS STREET, NILESWAR, KASARAGOD DISTRICT, NOW WORKING AT PALACE WAKRA, DOHA, QUATAR.

¶9

BY ADVS.SRI.K.V.SOHAN SRI.ROVIN RODRIGUES

¶10

RESPONDENT/STATE:

¶11

STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY S.H.O.HARIPAD, (CC.NO.35/2005(L.P.C.46/2007) ON THE FILE OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT NO - I, HARIPAD), REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA.

¶12

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.T.Y.LALIZA

¶13

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶14

mbr/

¶15

A.HARIPRASAD, J.

¶16

B.A No.4047 of 2015

¶17

Dated this the 17^th day of September, 2015.

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

Petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C in

¶20

a case where he absconded from the trial court. Non bailable warrant is pending against him in this case. He is involved in an

¶21

offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

¶22

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶23

learned Public Prosecutor.

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in

¶25

pursuit of a job he went abroad. So he could not appear before

¶26

the court. Considering the nature of allegations and the facts presented, I am of the view of that following directions can be passed :

¶27

Petitioner shall surrender before the

¶28

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court - I,

¶29

Haripad within a period of one month from

¶30

B.A No.4047 of 2015 2

¶31

today and seek bail in the above case. In that event, the learned Magistrate shall consider the application as expeditiously as possible on merits, if possible on the date

¶32

of surrender itself.

¶33

The application is disposed of.

¶34

Sd/-

¶35

A.HARIPRASAD, JUDGE.

¶36

//True copy//

¶37

P.A to Judge

¶38

amk

Muneer Puthiya Patillath v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Muneer Puthiya Patillath v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Renny George Vs State of Kerala

Ebin C Vs State of Kerala

Shyju Vs State of Kerala

Chandran Vs State of Kerala

Sam Paul Vs State of Kerala

Sundereshan Pillai Vs State of Kerala