Allowed

Ajith v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC22 Jun 2015Bail Appl./2387/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala allowed bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for two accused alleged of assaulting a KSRTC driver. The court imposed standard bail conditions including bond execution, reporting to IO, non-emigration, and witness conduct restrictions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on executing bond of Rs.25,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions of reporting, surrendering passports, and maintaining conduct.

Ajith Vs State of Kerala — Anticipatory Bail | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW

¶4

MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE 2015/1ST ASHADHA, 1937

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 2387 of 2015 ()

¶6

------------------------------CRIME NO. 611/2015 OF CHATHANNOOR POLICE STATION,KOLLAM DISTRICT

¶7

PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED A1 AND 2:

¶8

1. AJITH, AGED 23 YEARS, S/O. BABU, NEDIYAVILA VEEDU, MEENADU CHERRY, MEENADU VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

¶9

2. ANU,AGED 29 YEARS, S/O. BABY DAS, KOTTOR VEEDU, MEENADU CHERY, MEENADU VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

¶10

BY ADV. SRI.K.V.ANIL KUMAR

¶11

RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:

¶12

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶13

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. R.REMA

¶14

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶15

sts

¶16

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

¶17

====================

¶18

B.A.No. 2387 of 2015

¶19

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

¶20

Dated this the 22^nd day of June, 2015

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

¶23

Petitioners are alleged to have committed the offences under Sections 283,294(b), 332, 427 of IPC. The prosecution case is that they assaulted a KSRTC driver with a screw driver.

¶24

Heard.

¶25

The first informant sustained only some minor injuries.

¶26

Having regard to the fact that I am inclined to grant the prayer of the petitioners.

¶27

In the result, this application is allowed.

¶28

1)The petitioners shall be released on bail on their executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for

¶29

the like sum if they are arrested by the Police in connection with this case.

¶30

2)The petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer between 10 a.m and 11 a.m. on every second Friday for four months, or till the final report is filed, whichever is earlier.

¶31

3)The petitioners shall surrender their passports before

¶32

the lower concerned or if they do not have one, they

¶33

B.A.No. 2387 of 2015

¶34

::2::

¶35

shall file affidavits to that effect within five days of their release.

¶36

4)They shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court of enquiry or trial court as the case may be.

¶37

5)They shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses.

¶38

6)They shall not destroy or tamper with evidence.

¶39

7)They shall not get themselves involved in any other criminal case while they are on bail.

¶40

In case of violation of any of the above conditions,

¶41

the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with the law.

¶42

Sd/-

¶43

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, JUDGE

¶44

DST

¶45

//True copy//

¶46

P.A. To Judge

Ajith v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajith v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arif Vs State of Kerala

Anil Thomas Vs State of Kerala

Yousaf Vs Deputy Superintendent of Police

Subramaniyan Vs State of Kerala

Robert Vs State of Kerala

Sriajudheen @ Siraj Vs State of Kerala