Pankaj Builders v. Thomas Mathew
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Ernakulam dismissed the appeal and cross objection as settled out of court upon counsel submissions for both sides.
What did the court decide?
Appeal and cross objection dismissed as settled out of court.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/21ST KARTHIKA, 1937
AS.No. 886 of 1998 AND CROSS OBJECTION
(THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS.NO.398/1994 OF II ADDL.SUB COURT, KOZHIKODE DATED 26-02-1998)
APPELLANT(S)/DEFENDANTS :
1. PANKAJ BUILDERS,
- 8/71 CORPORATION OFFICE ROAD,
- REP. BY MANAGING PARTNER PANKAJ KUMAR A BULANI,
- AGED 38 YEARS, KOZHIKODE, MADHUBEN, MAVOOR ROAD,
- KOTTOOLI, PARAYANCHERI, KOZHIKODE.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
PANKAJ BUILDERS
- appellant
KAMALA BEN.T. SHENGVI
- appellant
PUSHPUL PRAKESH BHULANI
- appellant
WINDSOR BUILDERS
- respondent
THOMAS MATHEW
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court