Sadasivan v. Sasi
Case brief
What is this about?
Court dismissed writ petition as infructuous since the underlying appeal pending at the time of the impugned order has since been disposed of.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA
THURSDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014/27TH BHADRA, 1936
WP(C).No. 8564 of 2010 (O)
IA.1589/08 IN OS 302/2007 of MUNSIFF COURT, MAVELIKKARA
PETITIONER:
SADASIVAN, S/O.LATE NARAYANAN, EDAPPURAYIL, ANJILIPRA MURI, KANNAMANGALAM VILLAGE MAVELIKKARA TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.R.RAMADAS
RESPONDENTS:
- SASI, VANIYAPPURAYIL VEEDU, ANJILIPRA MURI, KANNAMANGALAM VILLAGE.
- SUDHAKARAN, VANIYAPPURAYIL VEETTIL, ANJIILIPRA MURI, KANNAMANGALAM VILLAGE. (REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SASI)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SADASIVAN
- respondent
SASI, SUDHAKARAN, STATE OF KERALA, TAHSILDAR, VILLAGE OFFICER, REGHU
Coram
B.KEMAL PASHA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court